English for Masters
Perm State University


Курс английского языка для студентов магистратуры физического факультета
домашняя страница информация о курсе учебные материалы групповая зачётка


передача содержания текста, раздел 4


Составьте пересказ текста, размещённого ниже, применив свои знания об описании процесса. Вам нужно пересказать текст, оформив это, как описание действий автора.
Объём ответа - около 200 слов.

В своём пересказе в скобках укажите элементы процесса, которые Вы описываете.
Жирным шрифтом выделите слова, которыми Вы описываете эти элементы.

Например:
They continue with the question whether such scientific achievements are still necessary and popular nowadays. (способ и направление развития процесса).

Наиболее частые ошибки:

  • неоправданно маленький размер пересказа (не вся существенная информация представлена);

  • недостаточное количество глаголов и выражений, описывающих действия автора (должны содержаться почти в каждом предложении);

  • слишком большие цитаты из текста (оптимальный размер цитаты - словосочетание из 3-5 слов).

Clearly, science has mattered a lot, for a long time. Advances in food, public health and medicine helped raise life expectancy in the United States in the past century from roughly 50 to 80 years. So too, world population between 1950 and 1990 more than doubled, now exceeding six billion. Biology discovered the structure of DNA, made test-tube babies and cured diseases. And the decoding of the human genome is leading scientists toward a detailed understanding of how the body works, offering the hope of new treatments for cancer and other diseases.

“For a lot of people, life has gotten better,” said Dr. James D. Watson, codiscoverer of the double helix. “You don’t know what it was like in 1950. It wasn’t just the dreariness of Bing Crosby that made life tough.”

In physics, breakthroughs produced digital electronics and subatomic discoveries. American rocket science won the space race, put men on the moon, probed distant planets and lofted hundreds of satellites, including the Hubble Space Telescope.

But major problems also arose: acid rain, environmental toxins, the Bhopal chemical disaster, nuclear waste, global warming, the ozone hole, fears over genetically modified food and the fiery destruction of two space shuttles, not to mention the curse of junk e-mail. Such troubles have helped feed social disenchantment with science.

When the cold war ended, the physical sciences began to lose luster and funding. After spending $2 billion, Congress killed physicists’ preeminent endeavor, the Superconducting Super Collider, an enormous particle accelerator.

“Suddenly, Congress wasn’t interested in science anymore,” said Fred Jerome, a science policy analyst at the New School.

At the same time, industry spending on research soared to twice that of the federal government, about $180 billion last year, according to the National Science Foundation. One result is that Americans see more drugs, cell phones, advanced toys, innovative cars and engineered foods and less news about the fundamental building blocks and great shadowy vistas of the universe.

The main exceptions to the downward trend in the federal science budget are for health and weapons. This year, spending on military research hit $58 billion, higher in fixed dollars than during the cold war.

 

Hosted by uCoz